home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0783>
- <title>
- Apr. 13, 1992: Aerospace:Peace vs. Prosperity
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Apr. 13, 1992 Campus of the Future
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 50
- AEROSPACE
- Peace vs. Prosperity
- </hdr><body>
- <p>The proposed sale of F-15s to Saudi Arabia is forcing Bush into a
- no-win decision
- </p>
- <p>By Bruce van Voorst/Washington--with reporting by Staci D.
- Kramer/St. Louis
- </p>
- <p> Which is a higher priority for America, making peace in the
- Middle East or saving jobs at home? That, in extreme shorthand,
- is the painful quandary facing the White House as it considers
- the sale of F-15 combat jets to Saudi Arabia. If the U.S. makes
- the sale, it will contribute to the arms race in the Middle
- East. If the deal is scuttled, thousands of American aerospace
- workers could lose their jobs. Postwar tensions in the Middle
- East and the depressed U.S. defense industry have raised the
- stakes on both sides.
- </p>
- <p> In the latest volley, the chiefs of McDonnell Douglas and
- five other defense-industry giants urged President Bush last
- week to seek congressional approval quickly for Saudi Arabia's
- order for 72 of the combat jets and 100 spare engines. "There
- are those who advocate a wait-and-see posture," the CEOs wrote
- the President, "but time is something we simply don't have."
- Unless the sale (long-term value: $13 billion) goes through, the
- McDonnell Douglas subsidiary that builds the planes in St. Louis
- and Tulsa will begin a shutdown of its F-15 assembly lines this
- summer. McDonnell Douglas spokesman Lee Whitney says this would
- eventually cost the jobs of 7,000 employees at his company and
- 33,000 employees working for 2,000 suppliers in dozens of
- states.
- </p>
- <p> For the Bush Administration, the domestic call to arms
- comes at an inopportune moment. Just last January, pro-Israel
- lawmakers were able to persuade Bush to withdraw a proposal for
- a $15 billion weapons sale to the Saudis. The Administration is
- already up to its ears in controversy over its refusal to grant
- Israel $10 billion in housing-loan guarantees. As a result, the
- American defense industry regards the pro-Israel lobby as its
- nemesis in the dispute.
- </p>
- <p> With thousands of jobs at stake, industry leaders have
- launched a hard-sell campaign, dubbed U.S. Jobs Now, which
- features a slick video sent to Capitol Hill lawmakers. "We have
- a potential customer, and we're trying to make sure that
- customer gets a fair shake inside the U.S.," says John
- Capellupo, the president of McDonnell Aircraft. The contractors'
- argument is that if the U.S. turns down the deal, the Saudis
- will go to a European manufacturer. The Saudis have 96 F-15s,
- which they began acquiring in the early 1980s, but when the U.S.
- refused sales in mid-decade, the Saudis acquired British-made
- Tornado jets in a deal ultimately valued at $30 billion. "The
- question," says Vince O'Reilly, spokesman for the International
- Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, "is whether the Saudis buy
- aircraft made in St. Louis or from British Aerospace."
- </p>
- <p> Proponents of the sale hope that labor-union pressure will
- sway recession-conscious politicians. Yet some members of
- Congress have been so adamant in their objections that neither
- the Administration nor the Saudi government has had an appetite
- for the battle so far. Democratic Congressman Mel Levine of
- California has collected more than 200 signatures of members who
- oppose the sale on the ground that it contradicts the
- Administration's own antiproliferation policy. "A lot of people
- believe a big weapons sale at this juncture is unwise," says
- Toby Dershowitz, spokeswoman for the American Israel Public
- Affairs Committee, the leading pro-Israel lobby.
- </p>
- <p> With the heat so strong on both sides and the symbolism of
- the decision so starkly drawn, Bush's choice--or lack of one--on the F-15 sale will be one of the most telling indicators
- of the Administration's priorities this election year.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-